Menu

Hygienic Piping Design : Good Practices

Follow us on Twitter 
Question, remark ? Contact us at contact@myengineeringtools.com


1. Introduction
2. Avoiding dead ends
3. Pipe roughness and welding quality
4. Pipe coupling
5. Valves


1. Introduction

In food and pharma industries hygiene is a must, non compliance can lead to non quality, recalls or even legal pursuits. Hygienic design must be seen comprehensively for the whole factory, including building design, air handling, zoning, equipment design... One of the basics is to ensure that the piping that will be conveying the product is hygienically designed.

Hygienic piping design will indeed help in the following :

  • Avoid materials accumulation that can spoil over time and contaminate the finished product
  • Optimize changeovers efficiency and duration
  • Allow more efficient and shorter cleaning time, or even allow the implementation of a CIP (Cleaning In Place) system
  • Prevent foreign bodies generation from pipe parts

This page is focusing on good practices to apply when designing a hygienic piping system.

2. Avoiding dead ends

That is a fundamental of hygienic pipe design : avoid areas where there will be no flow (those areas are also called "dead ends").

If there is no flow, product will accumulate, deposit, have a long residence time and will be prone to spoilage. It means also that those parts of the pipes cannot be reached by cleaning agents for example during CIP (Cleaning In Place), or can even be difficult to access for operators manually cleaning the pipes in COP (Cleaning Out of Place).

The following rules must be respected :

No dead ends with length > 1.5*pipe diameter Pipe dead end maximum pipe length
Dead end must be orientated to promote flow as much as possible Best practice for dead end orientations in pipe hygienic design
Best practice for dead end orientations in pipe hygienic design
Pipe must be straight and slightly inclined to self drain Self draining pipe
Pipe reduction must be designed to be excentric, with diameter change from the top Pipe reduction design for hygienic pipe

It is also important to install properly probes used for instrumentation in the pipe. They must be in the flow of product, avoid to place them in position where they could not be completely wetted (and thus with the risk of having product not renewed on the probe, its fitting. For more complex instruments such as mass flowmeters it is preferable to mount them vertically in order for them to self drain.

In terms of pipe diameter, if possible, it is good to target a reasonable velocity in the pipe (1-1.5 m/s) which will reduce the risks of product accumulating at dead ends in the piping.

3. Pipe roughness and welding quality

Having a smooth surface will reduce the risk to harbor dirt and bacteria in the asperities of the pipe. It is why a pipe with a surface roughness < Ra = 0.8 microns will be recommended. The material must be Stainless Steel to avoid risks of rusting ; the correct grade of Stainless Steel must be chosen, especially if the pipe will have to handle corrosive materials during cleaning sequences for instance.

It is necessary to weld couplings to the pipe in order to be able to assemble it. Welding needs to be controlled to make sure they will not release foreign bodies, or harbor micro organisms due to a rough surface. Welding must be :

  • Done under inert gas coverage
  • Smooth / polished
  • Continuous (no gaps, no crevices)

The use of orbital cutting and welding is recommended over a fully manual operation that will be less precise. It is recommended to check individually all the pipes welding before installation.

4. Pipe coupling

Designing and assembling properly pipe couplings is very important to implement an hygienic pipe that will be easy to clean.

Coupling should be chosen and design to present the following characteristics :

  • Avoid gaps where product could accumulate
  • Be designed to avoid overcompression of the gaskets, this could damage the gasket, or push it on the inside of the pipe where it could generate foreign bodies
  • Ease the alignment of the 2 pipe ends when assembling, will prevent gaps or on the contrary parts protruding on the inside of the pipe
  • Preferably be easily dismantable to allow inspection and cleaning.

In practice, on the line, the operators must be careful to avoid pipe misalignment (if the coupling are not designed to avoid it). Especially having a gasket protruding on the inside of the pipe can generate foreign body if the gasket starts to be damaged, foreign bodies are a major cause of recall of products for pharma and food industries.

5. Valves

Simple valves design must be preferred when on the product flow in hygienic piping, typically butterfly valves.

It is also possible to use a new type of valves, called mixproof valves, which have also the advantage to be able to route safely different products at the same time or solutions used for CIP ; those valves are also designed to automatically clean the seats of the valve during CIP cycle. Mixproof valves have a leak detection feature, when one of the seats starts to leak, the product will be drained, which will be visible.

Mixproof valve principle

6. Design Calculations for Hygienic Piping

6.1 Pressure Drop (ΔP)

The total pressure loss along a pipe run is the sum of frictional loss and minor losses (valves, bends, reducers). Use the Darcy‑Weisbach equation:

ΔP_friction = f·(L/D)·(ρ·V²/2)
  
  • f – Darcy friction factor (Moody chart or Colebrook‑White equation).
  • L – Length of straight pipe (m).
  • D – Nominal pipe diameter (m).
  • ρ – Fluid density (kg·m⁻³).
  • V – Mean velocity (m·s⁻¹).

6.2 Reynolds Number (Re) & Flow Regime

Re determines whether the flow is laminar (Re < 2000) or turbulent (> 4000). For hygienic systems a turbulent regime (Re ≈ 10 000–30 000) is preferred because it enhances mixing and CIP effectiveness.

Re = (ρ·V·D)/μ
  
  • μ – Dynamic viscosity (Pa·s).

6.3 Velocity Recommendation

Target a superficial velocity of 1–1.5 m s⁻¹. This range balances shear stress (preventing product hold‑up) and energy consumption.

6.4 Minimum Self‑Drain Length

To guarantee complete drainage of dead‑end sections, keep the length L_dead ≤ 1.5 × D (as already noted). For inclined runs, a slope of 1–2 % ensures gravity‑assisted drainage.

7. Standards & Regulatory Guidance

Searches for “hygienic piping standards” consistently surface the following documents:

  • 3‑A Sanitary Standards – Covers pipe material, surface finish (Ra ≤ 0.8 µm), and joint design.
  • ASME BPE (Bioprocessing Equipment) – Provides detailed guidance on CIP/SIP, valve selection, and allowable L/D ratios (typically ≤ 4:1).
  • ISO 14644‑1 – Cleanroom classification, influencing piping layout and accessibility.
  • FDA 21 CFR 211 – Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements for pharmaceutical equipment.
  

8. CFD & Simulation for Optimisation

If the hygiene of the piping is extremely critical, some simulations can be done on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to verify that:

  1. No stagnant zones exist (visualised with residence‑time contours).
  2. Shear rates exceed the threshold needed for biofilm removal during CIP (≥ 500 s⁻¹ for most dairy products).
  3. Pressure drop predictions match hand calculations within ± 10 %.

Typical workflow:

  • Create a 3‑D CAD model of the pipe network (including reducers, elbows, and valves).
  • Apply a turbulence model (k‑ε or SST) and set wall roughness to 0.8 µm.
  • Run a steady‑state simulation for normal operation, then a transient CIP simulation with hot water (80 °C) and caustic solution.

9. Maintenance, Validation & Documentation

9.1 Routine Inspection Checklist

  • Verify surface roughness (Ra ≤ 0.8 µm) using a profilometer.
  • Inspect weld seams for porosity or cracks (radiographic or ultrasonic testing).
  • Confirm that all instrumentation ports are fully wetted during CIP (use dye‑trace tests).
  • Record torque values on couplings to avoid over‑compression of gaskets.

9.2 Validation Protocols

For GMP environments, a Installation Qualification (IQ), Operational Qualification (OQ), and Performance Qualification (PQ) are mandatory. Include the following acceptance criteria:

  • Maximum residual product after CIP < 0.1 mg L⁻¹.
  • Pressure drop variation < 5 % between OQ runs.
  • No detectable biofilm after 30 days of operation (ATP assay).

10. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the ideal pipe roughness for hygienic systems?
Ra ≤ 0.8 µm (per 3‑A and ASME BPE). Anything higher increases microbial adhesion.

How long can a dead‑end segment be before it becomes a contamination risk?
Keep dead‑end length ≤ 1.5 × diameter. For larger diameters, consider installing a dedicated purge line.

Which valve type offers the best CIP performance?
Mix‑proof (dual‑seated) or hygienic butterfly valves with automated seat‑cleaning cycles are preferred.

Do I need to calculate Reynolds number for every branch?
Yes, especially for branches feeding low‑viscosity liquids; turbulent flow (Re > 10 000) improves cleaning efficiency.

Is orbital welding mandatory?
While not legally required, orbital welding provides repeatable, low‑roughness joints that meet GMP expectations.