Menu

CSTR : reaction conversion

Follow us on Twitter 
Question, remark ? Contact us at contact@myengineeringtools.com


1. Reaction conversion
2. Batch reactor : reaction speed as a function of conversion
3. Conversion in case of multiple reactions
4. Advanced Engineering Considerations for CSTR Conversion
5. Practical Design Example – First‑Order Decomposition
6. Frequently Asked Questions

It can be interesting to define a conversion rate in order to express the reaction speed. The conversion is based on the limited reactant in a reaction. It is applied in this page to the CSTR reactor.

1. Reaction conversion

What is the conversion in a chemical reaction ?

The reaction conversion is a measure of the progress of the reaction referring to the limiting reactant. The reaction will indeed not be able to go further once one of the reactant is consumed. The conversion rate of the reaction, based on the limiting reactant (named A hereafter), can then be defined a XA by the following equation :

FA,out = FA,in * (1 + νA*XA)

With

FA,out =material flowrate of the limiting reactant A leaving the reactor (mol/s)
FA,in = material flowrate of the limiting reactant A entering the reactor (mol/s)
νA = stoechiometric coefficient associated to the limiting reactant A in the reaction considered. As we refer to a reactant, νA < 0
XA = conversion rate relatively to the limiting reactant A
    At t=0 : XA = 0
    At t = end of reaction : XA = -1/νA

2. CSTR reactor : reaction speed as a function of conversion

The mass balance in a CSTR reactor, perfectly stirred and isotherm allows to show that the reaction speed of a reactant A is :

rA = (Qin.[A]in - Qout*[A]out)/V.νA = (FA,in - FA,out)/V.νA

For the limiting reactant A, the flow of material leaving the reactor is :

FA,out = FA,in * (1 + νA*XA)

Thus the reaction rate can be expressed as a function of the conversion :

rA = FA,in*XA/V = Qin*[A]in*XA/V =[A]in*XA/tau


3. Conversion in case of multiple reactions

When the limiting reactant is involved in multiple reactions, the relations above can be generalized the following way :

If the reactor is at constant volume, we also have :

4. Advanced Engineering Considerations for CSTR Conversion

CSTR continuous stirred reactor in the context of chemical engineering

4.1 Reaction Order & Kinetic Models

The conversion‑rate relationship depends strongly on the kinetic order n of the reaction. For a generic rate law

\[ r_A = -k\,C_A^{\,n} \] the steady‑state design equation for a CSTR becomes \[ X_A = \frac{k\,\tau\,C_{A0}^{\,n-1}}{1 + k\,\tau\,C_{A0}^{\,n-1}} \qquad (n\neq 1) \] where \(\tau = V/Q\) is the residence time. For first‑order (\(n=1\)) the expression simplifies to the familiar form \[ X_A = \frac{k\tau}{1+k\tau}. \] Understanding the kinetic order helps you predict how changes in feed concentration or temperature affect conversion.

4.2 Temperature Effects & Arrhenius Law

Most reactions are temperature‑dependent. Incorporating the Arrhenius expression

\[ k(T)=k_0\exp\!\left(-\frac{E_a}{RT}\right) \] into the design equation enables a quick “what‑if” analysis of temperature swings in an agitated reactor. For exothermic reactions, the heat generated per unit volume is \[ q_{\text{gen}} = -\Delta H_r \, r_A, \] so thermal management (cooling jackets, internal coils) must be sized to keep the reactor isothermal.

4.3 Residence‑Time Distribution (RTD) & Mixing Quality

Ideal CSTR assumes perfect mixing, yet real vessels exhibit a distribution of residence times. The exit‑age distribution \(E(t)\) can be measured experimentally (pulse‑tracer test) and compared to the ideal exponential form \[ E(t)=\frac{1}{\tau}\exp\!\left(-\frac{t}{\tau}\right). \] Deviations indicate dead zones or short‑circuiting, which directly impact conversion predictions. Including an RTD correction factor \(\phi\) modifies the effective conversion: \[ X_{A,\text{eff}} = \phi \, X_A. \]

4.4 Multi‑Reaction Systems

When the limiting reactant participates in parallel or consecutive reactions, the overall conversion is governed by a set of coupled balances. For two parallel reactions:

\[ \begin{aligned} r_{A,1}&=-k_1 C_A^{\,n_1},\\ r_{A,2}&=-k_2 C_A^{\,n_2}, \end{aligned} \] the total rate is \(r_A = r_{A,1}+r_{A,2}\) and the design equation becomes \[ X_A = \frac{(k_1 C_{A0}^{\,n_1-1}+k_2 C_{A0}^{\,n_2-1})\tau}{1+(k_1 C_{A0}^{\,n_1-1}+k_2 C_{A0}^{\,n_2-1})\tau}. \] A cascade of CSTRs can be tuned to favour the desired pathway by adjusting residence time or temperature in each stage.

4.5 Scale‑Up Guidelines

  • Geometric similarity: Keep the height‑to‑diameter ratio (H/D) constant to preserve mixing patterns.
  • Power input per volume: Maintain the same \(P/V\) (W m⁻³) to ensure comparable turbulence intensity.
  • Mixing time: Verify that the mixing time remains < 10 % of the residence time at the larger scale.

4.6 Safety & Pressure Drop

Even though a CSTR is typically low‑pressure, rapid gas evolution or highly exothermic reactions can cause pressure spikes. Estimate the pressure drop across the agitator using the empirical correlation

\[ \Delta P = f \frac{\rho N^2 D^2}{2}, \] where \(N\) is the impeller speed, \(D\) the impeller diameter, \(\rho\) the fluid density, and \(f\) a friction factor obtained from pilot tests.

5. Practical Design Example – First‑Order Decomposition

Problem statement: A first‑order decomposition \(A \rightarrow B\) with \(k = 0.08\;\text{s}^{-1}\) is to be carried out in a CSTR at 298 K. Feed concentration \(C_{A0}=2.0\;\text{mol L}^{-1}\). Desired conversion \(X_A = 0.75\). Determine the required reactor volume for a flow rate \(Q = 0.5\;\text{L s}^{-1}\).

Solution:

\[ X_A = \frac{k\tau}{1+k\tau}\;\;\Longrightarrow\;\; \tau = \frac{X_A}{k(1-X_A)} = \frac{0.75}{0.08(0.25)} = 37.5\;\text{s} \] \[ V = Q \tau = 0.5\;\text{L s}^{-1}\times 37.5\;\text{s}=18.75\;\text{L} \]

Thus a 19 L well‑mixed vessel (rounded up) will meet the target conversion.

6. Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between conversion and yield?
Conversion measures how much of the limiting reactant has reacted; yield relates the amount of desired product formed to the theoretical maximum.
Why does a CSTR often give lower conversion than a Plug Flow Reactor (PFR)?
Because the reactant concentration in a CSTR equals the outlet concentration, the reaction proceeds at a lower average concentration than in a PFR, where concentration continuously drops along the length.
Can I improve conversion without increasing reactor size?
Yes – increase temperature (if reaction is endothermic), use a catalyst, operate a cascade of smaller CSTRs, or shift equilibrium by removing product.